UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS: offbeat, then surreal, finally redemptive

Photo caption: Matthew August Jeffers in UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS. Courtesy of Unidentified Objects Film, LLC.

The Odd-Couple-On-A-Roadtrip dramedy Unidentified Objects takes us on a singular journey – from the offbeat through the surreal to the redemptive.

The self-isolation of anti-social gay dwarf Peter (Matthew August Jeffers) is disrupted when his neighbor, the chirpy sex worker Winona (Sarah Hay) insists that he provide his car for her drive from New York to Canada. She seeks to keep an appointment there with her space alien abductors. Wanting nothing to do with Winona or any aliens, Peter is nonetheless driven by financial necessity to agree.

In every social situation, Peter is quick to find (or manufacture) a grievance and explode in a torrent of invective; the rest of the time Peter seethes, leaking unpleasantness. It turns out that he is grieving the loss of a close friend – and with an overlay of guilt.

The trip is eventful. The two encounter lesbian cosplayers (one proud to cosplay full time – is that a thing?). Peter has dreams of a traffic stop by an extraterrestrial highway patrolman and of unexpected kindness in Canadian roadhouse.

Matthew August Jeffers (Peter Hobbes) and Sarah Hay (Winona Jordan) in UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS. Courtesy of Unidentified Objects Film, LLC.

Yet the tone of Unidentified Objects is neither is not zany nor madcap. In his first feature, director and co-writer Juan Felipe Zuleta has created a character-driven story – no matter the odd occurrences, the roots of Peter’s unrest are simmering just beneath the surface. The story is about what Winona finds at the end of her trip, and, more profoundly, what Peter finds at the terminus of his.

Zuleta’s dream sequences are vivid and realistic – and all the more surreal because they seem real (until they don’t).

Through most of the film, Peter’s bitterness becomes grating, but, for those who hang in there, the payoff is worth it.

The US premiere of Unidentified Objects is at Frameline – in person on June 19 and streaming after June 24.

Matthew August Jeffers in UNIDENTIFIED OBJECTS. Courtesy
of Unidentified Objects Film, LLC.

FANNY: THE RIGHT TO ROCK: triple-threat trailblazers

Photo caption: Fanny in FANNY: THE RIGHT TO ROCK. Courtesy of Film Movement.

Fanny: The Right to Rock documents the first all-female rock band to get signed by a major record label and churn out five albums. Fifty years ago, the band Fanny was breaking ground for women musicians – and for lesbians and Filipinas. Women rockers were a novelty in the early 1970; imagine layering on LGBTQ identity and Asian-American heritage.

Although you probably haven’t heard of them, this was no garage band. They had a major label record deal, European tours, and hung out with big name peers. Unlike many male bands of the period, Fanny didn’t crash and burn due to drug use or clashing egos. They just never caught on with record-buyers.

It’s pretty clear that music industry and media sexism, combined with maybe being a little ahead of their time to deny Fanny stardom. Too bad – I would have loved to listen to them in their heyday.

Their music fits right into the stuff I was listening to in the 1970s. I’m guessing that the reason why I hadn’t heard of them is that they didn’t get played on FM radio in the Bay Area.

Fanny in FANNY: THE RIGHT TO ROCK. Courtesy of Film Movement.

These women can still really rock in their 70s, and they’re a hoot.

Fanny: The Right to Rock is filled with colorful anecdotes from back in the day. Todd Rundgren, an important early associate of Fanny, and Bonnie Raitt appear as eyewitnesses. Cherie Curry of the Runaways, Cathy Valentine of the Go-Go’s and Kate Pierson of the B-52s testify to Fanny’s trailblazing status.

I screened Fanny: The Right to Rock last year at the Nashville Film Festival. It releases into theaters, albeit very hard to find, this weekend. I’ll let you know when it becomes available on streaming services.

A HERO: Kafka, Iran-style

Photo caption: Mohsen Tanabandeh, Saheh Karimai and Amir Jahidi in A HERO. Courtesy of Amazon Studios.

In A Hero, the latest from Iranian auteur Asghar Farhadi, Rahim (Amir Jahidi) finds himself entangled in a Kafkaesque web of Iranian law and social convention. To start with, Rahim is in debtor’s prison. That’s right – Rahim’s creditor has him incarcerated so he can’t work to pay off his debt. Of course, the creditor is Rahim’s ex-brother-in-law (Mohsen Tanabandeh), who seems to prefer ruining Rahim’s life to being repaid.

Rahim gets a two-day pass, so the clock is ticking – Rahim must get his creditor’s sign-off in his 48 hours of freedom, or he goes back to the slammer. Rahim’s secret girlfriend Farkondeh (Sahar Goldust) happens on a lost purse with gold coins, but fluctuations in the gold market mean that the trove isn’t enough to pay off the debt anyway.

[MILD SPOILER IN THIS PARAGRAPH}. In any case, Rahim feels sorry for whoever lost the gold coins, so he finds a way to return them. The absurdity of a guy in debtor’s prison returning some gold that he found fair and square is noted by the prison authorities, who call in the TV news crews for a Feel Good story. In his 15 minutes of celebrity, everything is lining up to help Rahim to collect donations and pay off enough of his debt to avoid reincarceration..

Unfortunately, the creditor ex-brother-in-law is so bitter that he won’t play along. Then Rahim’s luck turns bad and things start spinning out of control. Traditional family honor makes things worse.

Rahim’s young son (Saheh Karimai ) accompanies him throughout much of Rahim’s two-day dash and witnesses his dad’s indignities and desperation – a particularly poignant aspect of A Hero.

Jahidi delivers a fine performance as the lead, and excels at portraying Rahim’s sense of resignation. 

Farhadi, perhaps the world’s leading master of the family psychological drama, does not make Feel Good movies. That’s because he makes the audience care so much about his characters that we ache along with them. The payoff is that Farhadi delivers genuine human behavior and authentic human emotion.

I summarized his Oscar-winning film A Separation, which as “brilliant film/tough to watch”. That movie and his The Past and The Salesman all reflect life at its messiness – especially how life resists our desire to make everything tidy and symmetrical. 

Those previous Farhadi films are more universal than A Hero, which is very specific to Iranian institutions and customs that Farhadi is criticizing. There would be no plot at all if this were set in a Western nation – Rahim would just get an on-line loan to refinance his debt – and he would never see the inside of a prison. I found A Hero two steps down from his other work – the payoff doesn’t justify the squirming.

Farhadi is highly admired by the Academy of Motion Pictures, which loves to jab at the oppressive Iranian government by praising Farhadi, so it is telling that A Hero was NOT nominated for the Best International Picture Oscar.

A Hero is streaming on Amazon (included with Prime).

DOWNTON ABBEY: A NEW ERA: harmless enough

Photo caption: Hugh Bonneville in DOWNTON ABBEY: A NEW ERA. Courtesy of Focus Features.

In Downton Abbey: A New Era, writer Julian Fellowes adds a chapter to the saga of the characters he created in the beloved television series. It follows the 2019 movie Downton Abbey which I liked and thought had wrapped up all the story lines. But, apparently, there was more wrapping up to do, and Downton Abbey: A New Era begins with a wedding, ends with a funeral and a birth, and constitutes a fitting farewell to Maggie Smith’s unforgettable Violet Crawley, Dowager Countess of Grantham.

The trailer is misleading, and suggests a fish-out-of-water romp with the most English of aristocrats and servants visiting France. Some characters do go to France, but they uncover a dramatic mystery that goes to the roots of the family’s identity. While they are gone, Lady Mary rents the Great House to a movie studio as a set, just as silent films are being replaced by the talkies; the predictable culture clash ensues.

This time, Hugh Bonneville gets to showcase his acting chops. Usually his Robert Crawley, Earl of Grantham, stands around in stiff correctness, placidly content with the old ways and irritated by any modernity, while smarter female relatives and servants manage up. In Downton Abbey: A New Era, he experiences the strongest emotions, and his fear of loss illuminates what really means the most to him.

To appreciate what his lordship faces in France, it bears remembering that the very first two episodes of Downton Abbey revolved around that most arcane rule of heredity, that of the entailment of estates. As they obsessed over breaking the entail, the characters seemed dressed for the 1900s, but with their feet firmly planted in the 13th century. Here is the best explanation of hereditary property laws and their original rationale.

On a lighter note, I must observe that the inept Molesley (Kevin Doyle), whose innocent earnestness led him into the most spectacular faux pas, has grown into the series’ funniest character not named Violet.

Maggie Smith in DOWNTON ABBEY: A NEW ERA, Courtesy of Focus Features.

We do get to enjoy a dose of Maggie Smith’s wonderful Violet. The cast does well in general, and Dominic West is great fun as silent film star Guy Dexter.

The one thing I disliked in the film is admittedly an Inside Baseball complaint. The character of the French aristocrat’s mother is one-dimensional and never evolves. That doesn’t bother me, but this stiff, underwritten minor character is played by Nathalie Baye, who is France’s greatest screen actress. (think Meryl Streep level). It’s a waste of Baye’s time and talent.

Director Simon Curtis doesn’t waste a second letting the camera linger on something that doesn’t move the plot; some of the transtions are abrupt, but at least the movie doesn’t drag. Curtis is a prolific TV director who has only directed five feature films (one of them being the very good My Week with Marilyn).

If you’re not already a Downton Abbey fan, there isn’t anything much in this movie for you. But if you are a Downton Abbey fan, it will be entertaining. Downton Abbey: A New Era is now in theaters.

LIKE A ROLLING STONE: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF BEN FONG-TORRES: tell me more

Photo caption: Ben Fong-Torres in LIKE A ROLLING STONE: THE LIFE AND tIMES OF BEN FONG-TORRE. Courtesy of Netflix.

The documentary Like a Rolling Stone: The Life and Times of Ben Fong-Torres lives up to its title, which is a very good thing. Fong-Torres, the longtime music editor of Rolling Stone magazine, is an accomplished man in the most interesting times. Like a Rolling Stone is a satisfying combo of Fong-Torres helping to invent rock music journalism, the history of Rolling Stone magazine, and Fong-Torres’ personal journey growing up the son of Chinese immigrants in baby boom America.

For rock enthusiasts, Like a Rolling Stone: The Life and Times of Ben Fong-Torres is filled with nuggets like:

  • Ray Charles, having been made comfortable by Fong-Torres, unleashing his resentment of racism and the mainstream co-opting of black music.
  • Fong-Torres himself interviewed about his Marvin Gaye interview, the first popular introduction of Gaye and how he thought of his artistry.
  • The audiotape of a candid moment ith Jim Morrison, apparently in a liquor store.

Fong-Torres reminds us that the coolest people are those who are not trying to be hip. A humble man among raging narcissists and ever the consummate professional, Fong-Torres behaved professionally even amid the hardest core rock star partying.

As his rock critic protege and now movie director Cameron Crowe describes him, Fong-Tores projects “a lightness and a gravitas at the same time“.  The best interviewers are, as is Fong-Torres, good listeners; Fong-Torres’s signature technique has been to follow-up the answers to his question with a simple “tell me more“.

The documentary also gives Fong-Torres the chance to reveal the origin of his puzzling name: His Chinese father came to the US under a false Filipino passport as “Ricardo Torres” to evade the Chinese Exclusion Act.

Like a Rolling Stone: The Life and Times of Ben Fong-Torres is streaming on Netflix.

18 1/2: the paranoid thriller meets the darkly silly

Photo caption: Willa Fitzgerald in 18 1/2. Credit Elle Schneider (c)2021, Waterbug Eater Films, LLC.

In 18 1/2, a dark comedy that sends up the paranoid thriller genre, we’re back in the vortex of the 1973-74 Watergate scandal. A low-level government clerical worker (an excellent Willa Fitzgerald) finds herself in possession of the infamous 18 1/2 minute gap in the Watergate Tapes. She’s trying to find the best way to leak it to the press. Double crosses and red herrings escalate, as does the dark, dark humor. The paranoia finally morphs into over-the-top horror movie silliness and a neo-noir epilogue.

Of course, co-writers Daniel Moya and Dan Mirvish (who directed 18 1/2) had to devise a way to get this notorious MacGuffin into her hands; given the paranoia, deviousness and clumsiness of the Nixon White House, their solution is surprisingly plausible. I am a Watergate buff, and their device passed my smell test.

To review American scandal history, the 18 1/2 minute gap was a national obsession between November 1973 and August 1974. Investigators had subpoenaed the tape recordings of various Oval Office conversations, seeking evidence of White House involvement in the Watergate burglary or its coverup. The tape of a key Nixon conversation showed up with 18 1/2 minutes in the middle ERASED. The presumption was that the content of the gap was highly incriminating, and it was very likely that Nixon himself, or someone acting at his direction, obstructed justice by erasing the tape. The White House explanation, that Nixon’s secretary Rose Mary Woods had contorted her body to accidentally erase the tape, was laughable. When another tape, the “Smoking Gun”, came to light in August 1974, Nixon was forced to resign.

Willa Fitzgerald is very good as the somberly earnest protagonist. Her sudden burst of lust signals 18 1/2‘s shift into pedal-to-the-medal parody

Vondie Curtis-Hall, John Magaro, Willa Fitzgerald and Catharine Curtin in 18 1/2. Credit Elle Schneider (c)2021, Waterbug Eater Films, LLC.xxx

Two of my favorite character actors, Richard Kind and Vondie Curtis-Hall sparkle in supporting roles.

Kind plays the operator of a remote motel, just enough of an eccentric oddball to make the audience think he may be unhinged. You’ll recognize Richard Kind, a reliable character actor and voice artist with 263 screen credits. My favorite Richard Kind performance was the moving portrayal of a man seeking closure after the death of his wife in Clint Eastwood’s Hereafter. I also love his recent lead role in Auggie.

Curtis-Hall gets to bypass unhinged on his way to monstrous. He and Catharine Curtin play an older couple of relentless sociability. The revelation of his true character is the keystone to the parody. BTW not many actors have been in as many good movies as has Curtis-Hall: Mystery Train, Passion Fish, Crooklyn, Gridlock’d, Eve’s Bayou, Honeydripper, Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans, Blue Bayou.

I screened 18 1/2 earlier this year at Cinequest, where it was the Opening Night film 18 1/2 opens in theaters this weekend, including at Laemmle’s Monica Film Center and soon the Glendale and the NoHo 7.

JANE BY CHARLOTTE: as mildly interesting as the subject

Photo caption: Charlotte Gainsbourg and Jane Birkin in JANE BY CHARLOTTE. Courtesy of Utopia.

In Jane by Charlotte, the actress Charlotte Gainsbourg examines the life of her mother Jane Birkin in a series of cinéma vérité candid moments and on-camera interviews. The English-born Birkin was a beauty in Swinging London known for her 1968-1980 Paris-based relationship with singer-songwriter lover Serge Gainsbourg, who is is a cult figure in France. Birkin and Gainsbourg collaborated in music and film, and were a celebrity couple.

Charlotte Gainsbourg and Birkin are an amiable mom-daughter, very comfortable with each other. Because of that, and perhaps because Birkin is so used to being in front of cameras (acting in movies, modeling and being hounded by paparazzi), Birkin opens up about her relationships, her parenting and what it’s like to physically age.

The thing is, I’m not really that interested in Jane Birkin (or Serge Gainsbourg, for that matter) – and I’m a Baby Boomer, formed in the era when Birkin was a minor pop icon. (Can someone be a minor icon?) Jane and Charlotte are two nice people, pleasant enough to spend 88 minutes with, but it’s not a compelling, unforgettable experience.

The one captivating segment of Jane by Charlotte is when Charlotte brings back Jane back to Serge Gainsbourg’s apartment, which Jane had not visited in four decades. Jane and Serge’s love nest for 12 years and Charlotte’s childhood home, it is fraught with memories and loaded with emotion. The museum-like apartment itself, reflecting Serge Gainsbourg’s singular taste and eclectic interests, is pretty cool.

BTW I’m a big fan of Charlotte Gainsbourg’s. She’s an often fearless and always interesting actor (including in Sundown earlier this year). (Just wish she hadn’t appeared in so many movies by that cynical provocateur Lars Von Trier; I originally posted that Von Trier was a dickwad, but The Wife made me change it.) This is Charlotte’s directing debut.

Jane by Charlotte is streaming on AppleTV.

HIT THE ROAD: a funny family masks their tough choice

Photo caption: Pantea Panahiha and Amin Simiar in HIT THE ROAD. Courtesy of Kino Lorber.

In Hit the Road, we join an Iranian family’s road trip. It’s a relatively uneventful journey through barren countryside, but it’s unforgettable because of the characters and the reason for their trip. Their motivation is more loaded than it first appears.

The 20-year old Big Brother (Amin Simiar) is driving the little four-door hatchback sedan, with Mom (Pantea Panahiha) in the front seat. Dad (Hasan Majuni) is sprawling in the middle of the back seat, his leg in a massive cast. The six-year-old Little Brother (Rayan Sarlak) is bouncing around the back. An old dog (literally on his last legs) is in the way-back.

The first thing we notice us that the little kid is very precocious and a tornado of energy, a naturally caffeinated rascal. He has no volume modulation dial, and this kid is going full blast all the time. Fortunately, he is really smart and mostly funny, and his parents have built up a tolerance, so they don’t bind and gag him (which, admittedly, briefly crossed my mind).

The second thing we notice is the banter between the mom, dad and little kid. They are sarcastic, always teasing, and hilariously deadpan. Everyone is constantly tossing off playful threats. Everyone, that is, except for Big Brother, who sits behind the wheel in stoic silence, steeped in melancholy.

That’s because he knows the real reason for the trip, which the parents have not truthfully disclosed to the kid brother. That reason is never made entirely explicit, but there’s a telling clue over halfway through.

[MILD SPOILER: Suffice it to say, sometimes parents must lose their child to save him.]

Hasan Majuni and Amin Simiar in HIT THE ROAD. Courtesy of Kino Lorber.

The acting is top-rate. Hasan Majuni is perfect as the dad, a guy you can imagine holding forth in front of the TV and bellowing, “Hey, bring me a kabob”. He is jovial and commanding, even when hobbling along on his cast. But when the dad is unwatched by anyone else, his thoughts are of what is ahead for his family – his look intensifies as it takes on loss, determination, grief and resignation.

Pantea Panahiha is just as excellent as the mom, caustically funny, but with strong emotions sometimes leaking out. She’s just trying to make sure the little kid doesn’t notice.

The Wife liked Hit the Road even more than I did. I found this especially significant since I generally enjoy both international cinema and challenging films more than she does. She particularly admired and was drawn in by the acting, especially by Majuni and Panahiha.

Rayan Sarlak in HIT THE ROAD. Courtesy of Kino Lorber.

Hit the Road is the first feature for writer-director Panah Panahi. Panahi clearly has a gift for making the most from a low budget, a tiny cast and a bleak landscape.

Hit the Road premiered at Cannes’ Directors Fortnight and then took to the festival circuit, including SFFILM 2022. It is now in theaters.

MONTANA STORY: a family secret simmers, then explodes

Photo caption: Haley Lu Richardson (left) and Owen Teague (right) in
MONTANA STORY. Courtesy of Bleecker Street.

A family secret simmers in Montana Story until it demands to be exploded. With exceptional performances by Owen Teague and Haley Lu Richardson, this is one of the best movies of 2022 so far.

22-year-old Cal (Owen Teague), a budding civil engineer, has returned to the Montana ranch of his childhood, where his comatose father is dying. Cal is saddled with arranging his father’s home health care and winding down his bankrupt affairs – grim, draining and thankless tasks. We eventually learn that the father, now helpless and unknowing, was domineering and cruel, a cynical mouthpiece for corporate polluters who masqueraded as a gentleman rancher.

Suddenly, Cal’s 25-year-old half sister Erin (Haley Lu Richardson) erupts onto the scene. Erin is a force of nature, bossy and clearly very, very angry. Erin unhelpfully begins second guessing Cal’s decisions, and unraveling one, without contributing to solving any of the issues.

Cal hasn’t even known where Erin has been for the past seven years, since she bolted from the ranch. Why is Cal deferring to Erin’s unreasonable behavior? Why is she so furious? The answers lie in a family secret that has not been resolved.

Haley Lu Richardson shines as Erin, whose unfiltered intensity, for better or for worse, commands every scene.

Owen Teague in MONTANA STORY. Courtesy of Bleecker Street.

Richardson has the showiest role, but Owen Teague’s quiet performance is exquisite. This is a melodrama, and the performance as Cal could easily have been overwrought. Instead, he perfectly captures this dutiful and seemingly passive man, with a hidden, festering guilt. Teague has been amassing screen credits since age 13 and appeared in Bloodline; in Montana Story, he wrote and performed his character’s own musical theme.

Montana Story was written and directed by Scott McGeehee and David Siegel, the filmmakers who created What Maisie Knew and the superb Lake Tahoe thriller The Deep End with Tilda Swinton and Goran Visnjic.

McGeehee and Siegel’s cinematographer Giles Nuttgens shot both those films (along with Hell and High Water). Montana Story was shot around Livingston and Bozeman, and Nuttgens made the most of the Big Sky vistas to highlight the characters’ emotional isolation.

Montana Story played the SFFILM 2022, and opens in theaters this weekend.

THE DUKE: he finally gets his audience

Photo caption: Jim Broadbent in THE DUKE. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.

The Duke is a showcase for character actor Jim Broadbent, who plays, fittingly, an overlooked man who finally gets the audience that he has yearned for. This true life story is an audience-pleaser.

Broadbent plays Kempton Bunton,the a working class guy in grimy 1961 Newcastle. Bunton is one of those people who needs to litigate every grievance, particularly slight, ordinary ones that the rest of us choose to bypass on the way to living our lives. The current outrage that has derailed Bunton’s life is the tiny fee charged to every Briton with a television; Bunton believes that the poorest widows and disabled vets should be excused from paying. He has elevated this to such a matter of principle that he has actually gone to prison for it. Yet no one takes notice of his campaign. His longsuffering wife (Helen Mirren) would prefer that he shut up and get a job.

Kempton Bunton is also a witty autodidact, with more mastery of literature and history than most college grads. And what he lacks in common sense, he makes up with a genius for the instantaneous barbed bon mot.

Bunton is incensed when the British government spends 140,000 pounds on a Goya portrait of the Duke of Wellington. Bunton objects to the government’s priorities (and is needled by Wellington’s post-military career as a reactionary politician).

It turns out that the painting is housed in a museum with some very significant security lapses, and soon it is hidden in Bunton’s Newcastle flat, with Bunton sending demands to the government, seeking to ransom the Duke’s portrait for relief in the television fee. A nationwide manhunt ensues.

Again, Kempton Bunton was a real person and these events really happened. Jim Broadbent is very fun to watch as they transpire.

Despite his eccentric passions, Bunton has never gotten the attention of any authority higher than the lowest government functionary or any audience bigger than passersby on his street corner. Events take a turn, and Bunton suddenly has a national stage. When Bunton gets to match wits with the poshest of his antagonists, Broadbent’s performance soars.

Movie goers have appreciated Broadbent’s gifts since he played Col the sympathetic bartender in The Crying Game. Since then, he’s been seen widely in the Harry Potter franchise and plenty of big movies. But I like him best in the most observational and character-driven films: Widow’s Peak, Little Voice, Smilla’s Sense of Snow, Iris, Another Year, The Sense of an Ending:

Jim Broadbent and Helen Mirren in THE DUKE. Courtesy of Sony Pictures Classics.

Mirren, of course, is brilliant and hilarious in a part that is severely glammed-down from her usual roles.

Matthew Goode sparkles with playful charm as Bunton’s realistic defense lawyer. I first noticed Goode as the scary thug in The Lookout (2007), but he is best known for playing Lady Mary’s sleek beau Henry Talbot in Downton Abbey.

Make sure you watch until the very end to see a cameo by James Bond and Dr. No.

The Duke is an amiable entertainment that finishes very strong. The Duke is in theaters.